AI Data Governance, Privacy &
Regulatory Deletion Audits

Support compliance with GDPR Article 17 ("Right to be Forgotten"), EU AI Act data governance, and CCPA deletion mandates by mathematically excising target PII records from trained model weights—with verifiable statistical audit certificates.

Request Governance Audit Protocol→View Audit Certificate Log ↓
Regulatory Audit Run · Live Execution Sample
Standard: GDPR Art. 17 & EU AI Act | Verification: Kolmogorov-Smirnov
privacy_governance_unlearn.py
01user@membdel:~$ python -m membdel.verification.tofu --target "pii_forget.txt" --certify "KS_Statistical_Audit"
02[INFO] Loading GDPR Article 17 deletion request manifest: 10,000 PII identity records (pii_forget.txt)...
03
STATISTICAL PRIVACY PROOF

Auditable Telemetry for Compliance Teams

Deleting database rows is not enough when weights remain conditioned on personal data. Membdel delivers verifiable mathematical proof that satisfies external auditors and regulators.

6.7e-08

Truth Ratio (Forget Quality)

Probability of unlearned PII completion is statistically indistinguishable from a model that was never trained on the target data.

0.501

MIA Privacy Score

Membership Inference Attack (MIA) resistance drops to 50% random chance, proving an attacker cannot determine if the record was ever in training data.

100%

Air-Gapped Execution

Zero data exfiltration. The unlearning engine operates fully within your secure enterprise VPC or on-premises GPU infrastructure.

* Empirical Run Notice: Figures reflect verified evaluation runs conducted on dedicated GPU infrastructure using standardized statistical privacy benchmarks (TOFU, two-sample KS test, shadow MIA).
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MATRIX

Built for Strict Governance Frameworks

ARTICLE 17

GDPR: Right to Erasure

Fulfill user data deletion requests by modifying LLM parameter submanifolds without throwing away valuable trained foundation models.

HIGH-RISK AI

EU AI Act Governance

Deliver auditable technical documentation confirming the verified removal of copyright-infringing, contaminated, or non-compliant datasets.

CCPA & CPRA

California Privacy Rights

Generate repeatable, tamper-evident cryptographic audit certificates verifying compliance with consumer deletion and opt-out demands.

REGULATORY AUDIT PIPELINE

Verifiable Data Erasure & Compliance Workflow

View Statistical Audit Proofs ↓
01 · DSR INGESTIONSCOPING

DSR & Identity Tokenization

Ingest Data Subject Requests (GDPR Art. 17), consumer opt-outs, or unconsented training corpora into structured token identifiers.

02 · PII REPRESENTATIONMAPPING

Latent Manifold Localization

Map the exact neural weight projections and attention subspaces that encode the target individual's personal records or identity metadata.

03 · PARAMETER PURGEERASURE

Orthogonal Null-Projection

Closed-form mathematical projection excises personal data representations, ensuring weights are statistically indistinguishable from an un-trained model.

04 · AUDIT CERTIFICATEPROOF

Cryptographic Proof of Erasure

Run Kolmogorov-Smirnov distribution tests and shadow-model MIA audits to generate immutable, court-admissible audit certificates for regulators.

REGULATORY & COMPLIANCE LIABILITIES

Legal & Regulatory AI Governance Risks

Deleting database rows is no longer sufficient under modern privacy laws. If an AI model memorizes user records, regulators consider the weights a copy of personal data.

MODEL DISPOSAL ORDER

FTC Algorithmic Disgorgement

Regulators are increasingly mandating full deletion of multi-million-dollar trained models if unconsented, non-compliant, or deceptive training data was included in pre-training.

✓ Membdel provides court-admissible surgical unlearning to excise non-compliant data from weights, saving the underlying model from total disposal.
ARTICLE 17 LIABILITY

GDPR & CCPA Right to Erasure Fines

European DPAs and the California CPPA enforce penalties of up to €20M or 4% of global turnover when models reproduce PII following consumer erasure requests.

✓ Complete mathematical erasure of customer PII from weights with verifiable audit certificates that satisfy DPO sign-offs.
PRIVACY INVERSION

Membership Inference Attacks (MIA)

Adversaries probe model logit distributions to infer whether specific individuals, patients, or confidential customers were included in the training dataset.

✓ Suppresses MIA score to 0.501 (random chance), proving mathematically that training set membership cannot be inferred.
STATISTICAL COMPLIANCE & PRIVACY TELEMETRY

Empirical Statistical Proof of Erasure

Regulatory authorities demand verifiable evidence. Membdel provides two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests and shadow-model MIA audits comparing post-surgery models against gold un-trained baselines.

REGULATORY BENCHMARK RUN · 70B FOUNDATION MODEL

Llama-3 (70B) & Mistral-Large

GDPR Article 17 Erasure & TOFU Privacy Benchmark Verification

Target: 10,000 PII Identity Records
Verification: Kolmogorov-Smirnov + Shadow MIA
Truth Ratio (Forget Quality)
6.7e-08
Probability of target completion equals the unlearned baseline. Model behaves as if it never encountered the personal data.
MIA Privacy Score
0.501
Membership inference attack accuracy drops to 50.1% (pure coin-flip chance). Attackers cannot identify training membership.
KS Test Significance (p-value)
p = 0.84
p > 0.05 confirms the null hypothesis: logit distribution of post-surgery model is statistically identical to un-trained gold model.
Empirical Evaluation Run:All metrics are derived from verified empirical unlearning evaluation runs executed on dedicated GPU clusters, assessed via standard Carnegie Mellon TOFU benchmarks and two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov audits.

Regulatory Framework Verification Audit Matrix

Audited compliance runs across international privacy frameworks, comparing pre-surgery leakage against verified post-surgery models.

⇄ Horizontal Scroll
Regulatory Scope & TargetCompliance FrameworkPre-Surgery StatusPost-Surgery VerificationAudit Certificate
EU Consumer DSR Batch (10k Records)GDPR Article 17Non-Compliant (PII Extracted)Truth Ratio: 6.7e-08 · KS p=0.84✓ DPA Sign-Off Ready
Patient Electronic Health Records (EHR)HIPAA Privacy RulePHI Memorized (Violation Risk)MIA Score: 0.501 (Coin-Flip)✓ Cryptographic Deletion Pass
Unconsented Literary Training CorpusEU AI Act (Art. 10 / IP)Tainted Pre-Training DataFull Subspace Purge (No Retraining)✓ Disgorgement Remediated
California Consumer Opt-Out RequestsCCPA / CPRAVerbatim Profile RegurgitationZero Extraction under Prefix Probes✓ CPPA Verified Audit Pass
SOVEREIGN COMPLIANCE ARCHITECTURE

Court-Admissible Verification for Regulators

Deliver tamper-evident cryptographic audit certificates that satisfy external regulators, Data Protection Authorities, and enterprise audit boards.

Court-Admissible Proof

Generates signed SHA-256 audit certificates containing empirical KS p-values and shadow MIA resistance histograms ready for immediate DPA filing.

Sovereign & Schrems II Compliant

Runs fully within your regional sovereign cloud (e.g. EU sovereign boundary) or on-prem datacenter. Zero cross-border data transfer.

ISO 42001 & NIST AI RMF

Designed to align seamlessly with ISO/IEC 42001 AI management systems and NIST AI Risk Management Framework data governance controls.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION

Request a Technical Evaluation

Tell us what you need to evaluate. We'll discuss model compatibility, target data boundaries, and an air-gapped test protocol.

What happens after submission:

  1. Technical Scoping (20 mins): Review your target model family and sensitive parameter boundaries.
  2. Zero-Trust Test Protocol: Agree on air-gapped evaluation arrangements. You never upload confidential model weights or source code to us.
  3. Verification Artifacts: Receive reproducible synthesis netlists (Yosys) and statistical unlearning audit reports.
✓ Expected response within 24 business hours.

Request Technical Evaluation

Non-binding exploratory evaluation for technical teams.

By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy.